Monday 05 décember 2005

Monday 05 December 2005

Men,
Some of your scholarly theoretical calculations explain to you that the physical world, the one you live in, only exists because you observe it. A remarkable advance, but which despite its boldness is still far from the intrinsic reality of the mind. What you call quantum mechanics is still food for thought and divides your learned communities rather than uniting them towards the final acceptance of a grandiose and, whatever may be said, divine.

But let’s accept this idea for a moment to follow what it implies and thus get closer to the universal idea that we are trying to emit on the inhabited worlds.

Observation stipulates attention and a point of reflection present in the universe. In other words, we observe something, by what we are, you are in reflection.

And the action thus creates a world acting according to the sensory intellectual stimuli of beings. An action which acts independently of knowledge since the idea would be valid for the insect or the animal. It remains to be seen whether you will accept that the spiritual presence would be enough to have projected into space the shape of a tree by the spiritual being concerned.

Now let us try by that very to understand or to evaluate what could mean the chance, in there; a virtual world therefore, reacting according to observation and ordering itself under the influence of the needs thus determined.

Chance under this vision is therefore no longer possible since the grateful value, that is to say the physical form or the fortuitous event is determined by the very mind of the observer.

You will agree that this easy shortcut and foray into the labyrinth of theories is made to make you aware, on the one hand about what you experience here at home, on your private lives and of

course on our events in general. Their form is subject to the observation which is made of them and according to the crucial sense of the mind which wants it and irreparably shares it. Thus are created the forms and their influences.

Us:
What you tell us, is a generality ?? (Christine a new person)

Them:
We try to make you aware of the vision, the recognition. Why do you see these things, why do you experience these things and where does this exclusivity come from.
The explanation that we have just transmitted to you is to meditate on, because assimilated, it can allow you to better understand how your mind acts and on the other hand, how what you call nature acts.
These are things you have heard my friends. Remember that we are a cane for you and not revealers of mysterious data. The universe above you should not impress your intellect. To get there you have to make the effort to reach out to him by opening yourself up to information.

Us:
During the session on November 7, you told us about the gray area. If we turn on the UV lamp during the session, that could be a plus?

Them:
Of course. Why is she here with you? At our request, good. What is needed here, as in everything else, is to know how to measure the sources between them. We need equal supports and not more or less powerful and annihilating explosions.
When we were talking about shadows, we were thinking more of your bright spotlights. They emit very concentric and non-diffuse lights. So try white, neutral or gray gelatins. Then try to move sources away to avoid halos, which attracts and fixes your video oscillations. Always keep in mind that the uniformity of a bright pool is more flexible than a hard light, much too determined and too strong to blend into our modulations.

Us:
Is the black light powerful enough?

Them:
No, of course. Think again about UV and infrared.

Us:
We were attacked in our way of contrasting the images we were receiving. Can you give us your opinion on what we are doing and should we continue in this direction?

Them:
We have already expressed ourselves on this subject, but will come back to this point. The work of the images is useful only in the sharing of the demonstration and the concern for precision which your technical company supposes. The contrast of the images is at the source, a bad light diffusion and of course a random contact. The contrast of the images we send you is part of the

process for obtaining others that will be effective from the training. But again, don’t be cautious and afraid of what you are doing.
You are not preachers and we are not trying to throw you in a place that is not yours. Be mature in your approach and above all loving. The work done on these events should be seen as adjustments. Indeed, it is not enough to contrast the clichés, also it is necessary to understand what is missing and add it upstream.

We leave you to your studies.

Sébastopol, Éric, Eraste and Tardieux.