Monday 09 May 2005
Friends, the greatest human discoveries began with a dream. A praise carried high in the hopes. A childish look at nature and its mysteries.
Man dreamed of flying, man dreamed of moving fast, man dreamed of immortality and well- being. Legitimate concerns, which still mark out the perilous road of your humanity and which generate significant scientific and technological developments.
Paths parallel to the many overlaps that perpetuate needs without really knowing their ideological basis.
We know why man invents planes, but we no longer know the archetype of these constructions. Where are the children who at the dawn of discovery watched the birds fly in the sky to a destination they always saw wonderful? Did the Transcommunication start as a childhood dream, are the promising beginnings that you are experiencing stemming from a legitimate craze? You have to look far and wide to answer this question, because people have always sought to unravel the mysteries of life. The machines that you develop, that you build with our objective participation, do not escape these rules. Intuition, the omnipresence of a reality, the goal of success that prevails in any calculation, like the intuitive gold digger who sets up his camp far from the beaten track.A difficult situation, even criticized, but which implies a discipline, a strength and a sense of the risks that we glorify. Because the greatest revolutions were made in hope, utopia and the excessiveness of dreams. There is no dead end in your path. My friends, no chance or better no risk of making a mistake, because generated by humanity, you follow practicable and predictable routes. The reality of the spirit is unstoppable, and your common interests are proof of this.because generated by humanity, you follow practicable and predictable routes. The reality of the spirit is unstoppable, and your common interests are proof of this.because generated by humanity, you follow practicable and predictable routes. The reality of the spirit is unstoppable, and your common interests are proof of this.
Us:
Is the feedback camera well placed? We think of its place in relation to the translucent screen.
Them:
In your setup, you seem to bemoan a lack of contrast and definition. Indeed this physical reality can deprive you of 30% of quality in the details of your images, since these are established on a non-modulable number of pixels in the video format that you use.
However, the optical ratio of your camera is low, the minimum focal length is not respected and the translucent screen as you think, makes you lose several degrees of clarity. That is to say of luminance. In this case, you can therefore move the cited camera, or pair it with another. We
perceive an unused one, there somewhere and which radiates from our fluids. It would be a good idea to incorporate it back into your setup. Then by going crescendo in the relative logic of the installation, you could also increase the level of the video signal by a UHF broadcast of better quality.
Us:
Which camera shines?
Them:
We see a camera on your left Jean-Luc.
Us:
Do you see any other material that shines?
Them:
Yes. Your laser, your glass, your amplifier, your frequency generator. Your video projector, your transmitters and your computers.
Us:
Are they being used well?
Them:
The combination is good, ie the elements are good, but badly placed, badly placed in the diagram. Your configuration needs to be changed. You seem to have some leads, don’t you?
Us:
So we have to review the whole configuration!
Them:
Poor buggers. You lack salt and here you are again to redo all the races. What is missing from your laser?
Us:
Divergent lenses.
Them:
Well, what’s missing from your sound carriers?
Us:
A multitude of supports.
Them:
Good. Why did you DIY your module with a piece of cardboard?
Us:
To avoid the reflection of the spot on the ice.
Them:
What is wrong? The spot or the ice?
Us:
We believe in removing the cardboard and removing the reflection by moving the ice.
Them:
That’s a good reflection. As you can see, things are good, but badly placed. Nothing that should not force you to lower your ears.
We do not see the machine as you do. We see a very stripped down aspect of it. It is through your reasons that we try to perceive this simple and fine idea. It is by probing your reactions and hacking your senses that we help you approach the machine that we perceive. We cannot portray this directly to you. We have tried, but you do not react. So we use analogies, similar configurations, to go towards:
1) an analysis
2) towards the understanding of a principle.
Our machine uses light and optics, but in a different proportion. In order for you to understand this, you need to understand the middle steps, otherwise you could not do this job.
Us:
you tell us that you have a different machine from ours and that to bring us to something equivalent, you gently influence us according to our reactions.
Them:
You are not far from the truth Jean-Luc. But the most sensitive of you does not understand this idea.
Us:
Are you really waiting for the technical evolution of our module for your events?
Them: oh, the wait is wide here. Do you think we are enduring the same weather as you? We are not waiting for you. No, we hope for you, as a father hopes for the success of his children. We dare to push you to be more organized.
Us: Question from an Internet user (Claudia). Since ICT is not an end in itself, but the most important is spirituality, this may be why you are not giving the real solutions. What do you think ?
Them: Oh, we’re not making a secret here. If our communication is established by recognition, analogy, and reflex, we are obliged to spell out our basic principles to you to even understand the first letters of our alphabet. This metaphor should show you, explain to you, that our prudence is not a choice made to reward only the deserving, but to demonstrate that today with you we cannot do better. It is up to you to rise up to receive more. To each according to his works.
Us:
Question from an Internet user: Do you think that in certain aspects of the UFO phenomenon and spiritualism are linked?
Them:
Yes indeed. We are there, faced with multiple spiritual manifestations, whether or not they are extraterrestrial entities.
Remember that the spirit is in principle extraterrestrial.
Us:
Internet users would like us to ask at the end of the session, if there is a particular message for one of them? (We did not know, when Tony asked us this question, who had asked it, it turned out after discussion that it was indeed a little heart to which they were answering)
Them:
For the one you call Little Heart?
He is there yes. He counts on you and your educational values. He doesn’t want to see you moping and accepts those who want your happiness. Your family is not particularly wrong. And this death is not an end. You know it well. Yes he understands you.
Us:
Do you have something to tell us to conclude?
Them:
We have so much to tell you that we prefer to leave it at that, your medium could not translate them all.
We leave you.
Late